Select Page

Review: Economics (3rd Edition): Making Sense of the Modern Economy

Economics (3rd Edition): Making Sense of the Modern Economy
Economics (3rd Edition): Making Sense of the Modern Economy by The Economist
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

It’s supposed to Make Sense of the Modern Economy, but for me it’s Making No Sense of the Modern Economy. Sorry, but this is diving into the deep end, this book.

I have no background in economics beyond some Ariely, Levitt/Dubner and an occasional book about the collapse of CDO-backed securities triggering shockwaves across Wall Street and the world.

To say I learned nothing would be inaccurate, yet I can’t say I learned a lot either. A lot flowed right past. I learned economics is simply a map with which we can use to try to make sense of the world. However it’s at best an estimation, and at worse a wild buckshot in the dark with the nozzle pointed at humanity. Despite the best theories the securities bust happened, crises happened and will continue to happen. So it’s really an examination of the various factors that influence the development of a nation.

This book bears a re-read, but hopefully when I’m more well-stocked on more econs fundamentals. I’m giving it 3 stars because it’s not the book’s fault that I didn’t learn as much as I could out of this, simply because I’m a curious passer-by, not an econs major.

Having said this, I hope my subconscious retained enough to allow me to whip out random info to be entertaining in parties.

View all my reviews

Review: PhiLOLZophy Critical Thinking in Digestible Doses

PhiLOLZophy Critical Thinking in Digestible Doses
PhiLOLZophy Critical Thinking in Digestible Doses by Chrissy Stockton
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

It was unexpectedly entertaining, this one. There was very little philosophy in this book, and more about the state of mind in various stages of growing up, how to recognize the said state of mind and how to handle it properly without skidding off the cliff of life and ending up in the chasm of mental oblivion (I’m practicing for NaNoWriMo, so forgive the extravagant yet terribly unwieldy phrases).

I’m giving it 3 stars no because of any philosophical eurekas, but it was a fun short book that I immediately re-listened the moment I finished it. Yes, I read (listened as audiobook) this one twice. Back to back.

The target audience for this book, I guess I’m not.

View all my reviews

Review: This is Not the End of the Book

This is Not the End of the Book
This is Not the End of the Book by Umberto Eco
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

The book is basically a recorded conversation between Eco and Carriere about several things, the chief of which is the head tree version of the book. My thinking going into this was that electronic books is definitely the future, and that all the books should exist digitally, which I truly believed to be its most refined form. Storing books in plain text file, free from silly constraints of requiring specialized software like PDF reader to get to the heart of the matter. What’s more pure than plain text files?

However, the authors’ points have merit and changed my way of thinking about long-term storage of books. One of the most incisive observation was Carriere’s “There’s nothing more ephemeral than long-term media formats.” I strongly opposed this statement at first. In the first place, there’s something to be said about storing data digitally, and having the flexibility to reprint it in any form, including, yes, a book. The data can be pure text, and even though I dislike proprietary viewers as a means of long-term storage, the PDF format is defined clearly enough, lived in public domain long enough to warrant competent implementation of views to guarantee long-term archival purposes. And the cloud. Oh the cloud. Imagine being able to recall any (any!) book in its best fidelity anytime and virtually anywhere you have a connected mobile device. How is that ephemeral?

However, Carriere mentioned an example of a director friend of his who stocks his basement with old computers and machinery just to see films/footage recorded on media no modern devices can use anymore. The disks and tapes and cards and all manner of obsolte storage technology, with valuable digital data trapped inside with no other way to safely retrieve them. Also about data store on archaic CD-ROMS, once held as ‘the’ ‘permanent’ storage needs. Loaded on it programs that can no longer run on modern computers.

Sobering. He’s right. Imagine a global catastrophe like nuclear war or the flu epidemic, wiping out access to electricity (this scenario is laughably easy to arrive at, given that we’ve seen proofs of how fragile the supply chain is when hit with an emergency). What good is streams of bits then?

In this scenario, the book is clearly superior. “The book is like a spoon: once invented, it cannot be bettered.” Eco may not be wrong here.

What I felt is that leaving everything as a physical book is terribly… inefficient. But total reliance on digital formats is not the answer either. Therefore there should be complementary efforts to have these two formats exist together. The constant debates to land on one side or the other is ultimately pointless. What we need is to perfect the content representation technology (and PDFs are not the solution long-term), store it in the most OS-agnostic, system-agnostic manner possible and propagate it over a redundant, highly available cloud infrastructure that’s not government or corporate-owned. And this alongside libraries or archives working to preserve significant physical works for the future generations.

Works to digitize existing works mustn’t stop. This is the only way to spread knowledge and ideas otherwise trapped in books held only by either the fortunate or the privileged.

This book also talks about how culture is a form of censorship or natural filtering. Too much data like what we have today is as damaging as not having enough data. There are many books mentioned by great classical works that never survived to the present day. There’s no way to know if these works are as good as it is claimed to be, or are the ones we have truly the best of the best.

Eco and Carriere spent a lot of time talking about incunabulum, which roughly a book published in the 15th century, a kind of ancient book or manuscript. They touch on their collecting habits, which is enormous and obviously worth a tidy sum.

They also touched on all the books they’ve’ purchased but not read. It doesn’t bother them, obviously. “I haven’t read of these books. Why would I keep them otherwise?” was one response to a question by a visitor asking if they’ve read all the books in their fearsome library.

Overall, a good book to meditate on. The memories of both men as they cite example after example of obscure books and authors and films and directors is very impressive. And not all in their native languages too. True intellectuals.

View all my reviews

Review: The Sketchnote Handbook: The Illustrated Guide to Visual Note Taking

The Sketchnote Handbook: The Illustrated Guide to Visual Note Taking
The Sketchnote Handbook: The Illustrated Guide to Visual Note Taking by Mike Rohde
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

I liked this book very much, and it has some great ideas, but I wanted more of the visual vocabulary that the book covers somewhere at the end. I know my note-taking style, and it’s verbose, and I’d like to be able to take that and marry it with some visual elements, something I was hoping this book would teach me. I also wanted to take the said visual vocabulary and extend it to presentations or whiteboarding sessions, where I frequently convey ideas to clients/consultants in the simplest way i know how. Right now it’s squares and skinny arrows, but it would be cool if I knew more.

Right now the best book I’ve found at representing data or concepts visually remains Dan Roam’s The Back of the Napkin.

This book doesn’t go into more depth for me personally, but it’s totally a great one for those who’d like to begin taking notes visually, and to synthesize info in a visual manner.

View all my reviews